Cases 111 - 120 of 3,472
Harvey v. Mearlon
as 4:2023cv03969
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant:
L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Paxton et al
as 1:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Conner
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regalado v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00931
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Regalado
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, M. Rembert and L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quin Butler
Defendant:
Tasha Barnett, Rachel M Anderson and Bryan L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2023cv02191
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Busby v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bryan L. Williams, Dr Kevin B Smith, Anthony J Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Hall
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Elliott Williams
Defendant:
S Perez, B . Smith, J Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Mitchell et al
as 6:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Rickey L. McGee
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, FNU Brennan, FNU Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
