Cases 141 - 150 of 825
Massaly v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Diane L. Witte, Attorney General William P. Barr, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Victor Jerry Massaly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chapman v. Williams, et al
as 3:2020cv00200
Respondent:
Jessie J. Williams and Jim Hood
Petitioner:
Robert Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Metcalf v. William
as 4:2020cv00092
Petitioner:
Darryl Metcalf
Respondent:
Jessie William
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCaley v. Fillyaw et al
as 3:2020cv00298
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hills, Officer Unknown Martin, Officer Unknown Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Cordellra McCaley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00104
Plaintiff:
Louis Gonzalez and Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Shawn R. Gillis, Stanley Crockett, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00368
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Wendell Banks, Officer Unknown Long, Officer Unknown Lonnie and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Dyer et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gains S. Dyer, Lynn Fitch and Ronald King
Plaintiff:
William Wade Love
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Sheriff Kelvin Williams and Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Forrest County Jail
as 2:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
Alfred Williams
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaley v. Fillyaw et al
as 4:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Carrie Williams, C/O McClain, Officer Hills and others
Plaintiff:
Cordellra McCaley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
