Cases 151 - 160 of 102,861
Thompson v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sidney Maurice Thompson, IV
Defendant:
Laurie Sue Baldwin, Marlon Thomas, Nueces Country Jail Correctional Officer Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Harris County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2024cv01948
Plaintiff:
Karah Denice Nichols
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriffs Office, Harris County and Unknown Arresting Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunnicutt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01231
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01254
Petitioner:
Tiuan J Moore
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nadeau v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ryan Nadeau
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Luther Dwayne Parks
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Fletcher
as 6:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Enrique A. Diaz
Respondent:
Sheriff Brandon Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 9:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Galveston County, Kate Willis, John Kinnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
