Cases 11 - 20 of 412
Magruder v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01102
Petitioner:
Rebecca A Magruder
Respondent:
Jody R Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harper v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01103
Petitioner:
Natasha Harper
Respondent:
Jody R Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Highfield v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01106
Petitioner:
Linda Highfield
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rhonda Fleming v. Jody Upton, et al
as 16-11721
Petitioner - Appellant:
RHONDA FLEMING
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JODY UPTON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Diana Osteen v. Jody Upton, et al
as 16-11718
Petitioner - Appellant:
DIANA OSTEEN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JODY UPTON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Flournoy v. Warden et al
as 4:2016cv01097
Petitioner:
Dawn Deshonna Flournoy
Respondent:
Warden, Department of Justice and President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Little v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01079
Petitioner:
Charlsa Suzanne Little
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nowlin v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01046
Petitioner:
Yolanda Nowlin
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Barack Obama and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-51332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Brown v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv00988
Petitioner:
Jennifer Lynn Brown
Respondent:
Jody Upton , Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
