Cases 211 - 220 of 5,412
James Loften v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40566
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ERIC LOFTEN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Nguyen v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01022
Petitioner:
Cuong Anh Van Nguyen
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hector Sanchez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20236
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Crayton v. Stephens
as 3:2016cv00101
Petitioner:
Paul Anthony Crayton
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frankie Nealy v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20235
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANKIE WAYNE NEALY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Theron Owens v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20233
Petitioner - Appellant:
THERON GREGORY OWENS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Stephanie Bekendam v. TDCJ-CID/Parole, et al
as 16-50380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANIE LYNN BEKENDAM
Defendant - Appellee:
TDCJ-CID/PAROLE, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH - GATESVILLE, WITCHITA COUNTY, TEXAS and others
Dennis Poledore, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20237
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS JAMES POLEDORE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Canady v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01050
Petitioner:
Warren Pierre Canady
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valdez v. Stephen et al
as 2:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Joe Carl Valdez, Sr
Defendant:
William Stephen, Norvel Arnold, Warner B Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
