Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Garza et al v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2015cv04008
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garza , Carlos Alvarez Castro , Jeremias Chevez and others
Defendant:
Dallas County, Texas and Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lujan v. USA
as 4:2015cv00058
Petitioner:
Michael Lujan
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2015cv00049
Defendant:
Captain Kevin Blackshear, Raul Hernandez, Lieutenant David Hobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Lujan
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shahram Shakouri v. Gary Raines, et al
as 14-50137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHRAM SHAKOURI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIT CHAPLAIN GARY E. RAINES, ASSISTANT WARDEN KEVIN PINNEY, WARDEN STEVEN SWIFT and others
Roberts v. Whitfield et.al.
as 4:2014cv00012
Defendant:
Warden Bowers, Major Lujan, Cpt McQuary and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shakouri v. Medrano et al
as 4:2014cv00011
Defendant:
Michelle L. Biese, Roger E. Bowers, Jamie M. Cazares and others
Plaintiff:
Shahram Shakouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Whitman et al
as 4:2013cv00052
Defendant:
Warden Bowers, Major Lujan, Cpt McQuary and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madrid v. Jeter et al
as 4:2013cv00041
Defendant:
Michelle Beise, Rodger Bowers, Imer Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Mike Madrid, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Bowers et al
as 4:2013cv00029
Defendant:
Roger Bowers, Ricky Lujan and Daniel McQuary
Plaintiff:
Arthur White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
