Cases 21 - 30 of 1,012
Armenta v. Jacques, et al
as 5:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Michael Armenta
Defendant:
F.C.I. Sherdan, F.C.I. Sheridan, Warden FNU Jacques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Hend et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Melodio Reyes
Defendant:
Warden Hend, Asst. Warden Galindo, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Unknown Defendant
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Glenvert Green, Jr
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Juana Idalia Sanchez
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sandvig v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Kurt Sandvig
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Victor Lugo
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Brigette D Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. BOP
as 4:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Smith
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Central Grievance Office et al
as 6:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Central Grievance Office, Captain FNU Defoor, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gordon et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Athony Gordon, Central Grievance Office, Mike Ptasiensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
