Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Rubalcava Camacho v. USA
as 5:2016cv00180
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Heriberto Rubalcava Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Camacho v. USA
as 2:2016cv00916
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ordonez-Camacho v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ediburga Ordonez-Camacho
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Camacho-Andrade v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00118
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Camacho-Andrade
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. Director's Review Committee et al
as 1:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Paulo Ibrain Martinez
Defendant:
Director's Review Committee, Mail System Coordinators Panel, William Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Laverne et al
as 2:2014cv03179
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Camacho
Defendant:
Charles Laverne and Gregory Tette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2014cv00781
Plaintiff:
Luis Raul Camacho
Defendant:
Rick Perry, John Steen and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Olasunka Adeleke, Charles Amie, Paul Clarence Bailey and others
Defendant:
Rick Perry, John Steen and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2014cv00713
Plaintiff:
Luis Raul Camacho
Defendant:
Governor Rick Perry and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2014cv00700
Plaintiff:
Sadiq Olasunka Adeleke, Charles Amie, Paul Clarence Bailey and others
Defendant:
Governor Rick Perry and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
