Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Bevans v. Port Isabel Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00273
Petitioner:
Barrett H. Bevans , Sr.
Respondent:
Port Isabel Detention Center, United States of America , Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bevans v. Willacy County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 1:2010cv00271
Petitioner:
Barrett H. Bevans , Sr.
Respondent:
Willacy County Regional Detention Facility , Medical Department and Unknown Willacy County Regional Detention Facility Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyter v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv03252
Plaintiff:
Karl A Boyter
Defendant:
Belinda Smith, Christy Pechacek, Ann Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00148
Petitioner:
Tony Ray Mitchell
Respondent:
Dee Anderson, David Barrett and NFN Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castelano et al v. Rice et al
as 7:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Amalia Ramirez Castelano, Florencio Gonzalez, Jr., Arturo Garcia, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Condeleezza Rice, United States Of America, Patrick F. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Berry v. Westmoreland
as 3:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mark Edward Berry
Defendant:
Lee Barrett Westmoreland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Quarterman
as 6:2008cv00306
Petitioner:
Bobby Barrett
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2008cv00387
Petitioner:
Bobby Barrett
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrett v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv02526
Petitioner:
Gregory Barrett
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
