Cases 31 - 40 of 477
Dunnigan v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
LilReginald Janario Dunnigan
Defendant:
Judge John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shorter v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Shorter
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Keith Penton
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Dyques Antoione Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. John Doe
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Lamor D. Stewart
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mclendon v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Aaron Paul Mclendon
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Mississippi State Bar et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Billy C. Anderson
Defendant:
Mississippi State Bar, Joe Beard, Stewart Unknown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkes v. John Does
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Travis Burkes
Defendant:
John Does
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peake v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Stephon Peake
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
