Cases 41 - 50 of 766
Flores v. USA
as 3:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
Judith Sandra Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Flores v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Sergio Alberto Flores
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Willie Medina and Guillermo Flores Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Johnson County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Edward Alonso
Defendant:
Johnson County Jail, Unknown Corrections Officer, Corporl McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Adrian Flores
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Flores et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kiera Henderson
Defendant:
Ben A Flores, Christopher Ramirez, Patrick H. Chappell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Rodriguez et al
as 9:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jeron Neal
Defendant:
Cesar Rodriguez, Jesus M Salgado, Jr, Ty M Paredes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Sheriffs Office LEC et al
as 7:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Donny Ray Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office LEC and Ishmaul Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Jesus-Flores v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Ismael De Jesus-Flores
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
