Cases 61 - 70 of 756
Duarte v. State of Texas, et al.
as 5:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Texas, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Director, TDCJ-CID *Case Transferred to Western District of Texas*
as 6:2022cv00398
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Garrido
as 4:2022cv00836
Petitioner:
Todd McDonald
Respondent:
F J Garrido and Freddie Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ibrihim v. FMC Fort Worth Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Siraj Ibrihim
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth Warden, Dewun Settle, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calton v. Keller et al
as 1:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
Judge Sharon Keller, Mike Keasler, Barbra Hervey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00333
Petitioner:
Jose F. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Lumpkin Example:
as 4:2022cv03106
Petitioner:
Jose F. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
John F Hawkins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
