Cases 71 - 80 of 422
Slayton v. Grace et al
as 4:2021cv03603
Plaintiff:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant:
Joshua Bernard Grace, Dr. Jeffery Lewis, Houston Area Masonic Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway, Jr. v. Schur
as 5:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Schur, Kody R. Schur, Jacqueline Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2021cv02969
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
City of Houston, State of Texas and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00712
Petitioner:
Christopher Houston Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peters v. Chabad Outreach of Houston et al
as 4:2021cv02487
Plaintiff:
Michael G Peters
Defendant:
Chabad Outreach of Houston, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice and The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 3:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 4:2021cv02069
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County District Clerk, Judge William Harmon and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hebert v. Brueggea et al
as 4:2021cv01376
Defendant:
J. E. Smith II, All Agents Present - Houston Peace Officers/Spec. Narc Task Force, Josh Brueggea and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Hebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randon v. The Houston Police et al
as 4:2021cv00794
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Texas Medical Center, The Houston Police and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Randon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wallace et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Hayes, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
