Cases 71 - 80 of 3,626
Sanders v. Goings et al
as 1:2010cv00059
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Quarterman
as 1:2010cv00072
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Aguirre
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardeman v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lonel Hardeman, Jr
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Raymond Thompson, Unknown Lamberth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Steven N Rich, Stephanie Zepeda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Quarterman et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Danny Price
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Alfred A Benson, Richard Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Quarterman
as 5:2010cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert Troy McClure
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vinson v. Thaler et al
as 9:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Martin E Vinson
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Nathaniel Quarterman, Billy D Hirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00012
Petitioner:
David Lujan
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and R. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant:
United States of America, Nathaniel Quarterman, Edward Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pulido v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Jose Ines Pulido
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
