Cases 71 - 80 of 102,692
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nieto v. USA
as 3:2024cv01169
Petitioner:
Sofio Nieto, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Beauchamp v. USA
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Durant Nash Beauchamp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton v. State of Texas 272nd District Court et al
as 4:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Emanuel A. Milton
Defendant:
State of Texas 272nd District Court, Brazos County District Attorney, Officer Maldanado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Sheriff Clint McRae, Sheriff Keith Dehart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meares v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Meares
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Sean House and Angelica Blanco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Coble et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
Michael D Coble, Gabriel D Martinez and Brenda K Laster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Travis Edward Anderson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
