Cases 81 - 90 of 137
Howard v. Stephens et al
as 4:2014cv00844
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
William Stephens, Tracy Bailey, Christopher Lacox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Gun Barrel City, Texas et al
as 6:2013cv00959
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Nichols
Defendant:
Gun Barrel City, Texas, Gun Barrel City Police Department and Gun Barrel City Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Livingston et al
as 4:2013cv02679
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Tracy Bailey, Christopher Lacox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Livingston et al The Clerk shall accept no further filings from Ortiz unless accompanied by the full filing fee and the sanction fee.
as 3:2013cv00330
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Warden of Retrieve Unit, Assistant Warden of Retrieve Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFerrin v. Oates et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ervin Lee McFerrin
Defendant:
Terry Oates, Gideon Daniels, Brandon Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Stephens et al
as 4:2013cv02383
Defendant:
William Stephens, Tracy Bailey, Lacox and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Walker et al
as 1:2013cv00502
Petitioner:
Nathan Joel Nichols
Respondent:
Layne Walker and Mitch Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Tanner et al
as 3:2013cv02024
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Edwards
Defendant:
Elmer Tanner, Tommy Nichols and Charlie York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 9:2013cv00109
Petitioner:
Sylvester Nichols
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2013cv00306
Petitioner:
Sylvester Nichols
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
