Cases 81 - 90 of 105
McClore v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00090
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Sky L. McClore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reidar Arden v. Rachel Chapa
as 14-50036
Petitioner - Appellant:
REIDAR CARROLL ARDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden, La Tuna Federal Correctional Institution
Baker v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00006
Petitioner:
James E. Baker
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa and United States Bureau of Prisons
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
John Cockerham, Jr. v. Rachel Chapa
as 13-51123
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN COCKERHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden
Diego Villalobos, Jr. v. Rachel Chapa
as 13-51122
Petitioner - Appellant:
DIEGO VILLALOBOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA
Moon v. Chapa et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa and John and Jane Does 1-10
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
George v. Chapa
as 3:2013cv00353
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Petitioner:
Eddy George
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Defendant:
Elsa Alexander, Norma Avila-Munoz, Rachel Chapa and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockerham v. Chapa
as 3:2013cv00327
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Herrera v. Chapa
as 3:2013cv00316
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa
Petitioner:
Guillermo Herrera
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
