Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Lester v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte, Stacy Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Brouse et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. Case has been electronically transferred to USDC ED/TX- Marshall Division.
as 2:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Respondent:
Charolette Brouse and Mallory Brouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brouse et al
as 4:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Charolette Brouse and Mallory Brouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brimingham et al DO NOT DOCKET Case electronically transferred to The Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.
as 2:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Respondent:
Rod Brimingham and Don Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Brimingham et al
as 4:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Rod Brimingham and Don Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
