Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Callicotte v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jason Colby Callicotte
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Medina v. Hirsch et al
as 6:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jose A Medina
Defendant:
Billy Hirsch, Senior Warden Jimmy Bowman, Lisa Mcclain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casel v. USA
as 3:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Cecil Charles Casel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Holley v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00276
Petitioner:
James Cecil Holley, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden F.J. Garrido and F.J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thompson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cecile Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Howell, Jr. v. Simon et al
as 9:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Darra Simon, Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howell, Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 9:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly, Jr., John D. Lackey II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks et al v. Valdez
as 4:2022cv03367
Plaintiff:
Cecil Demmerit Banks, Amario Lynn McPherson, Johnny Walker and others
Defendant:
Charley Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02947
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
