Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cherry v. Barry et al
as 2:2021cv00047
Petitioner:
Steve A. Cherry
Respondent:
Warden Waymon Barry, M. Samaniego, D. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Keller et al
as 1:2018cv01012
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Hervey, Judge Mike Keasler and Presiding Judge Sharon Keller
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Garcia
Defendant:
Ruth E Brouwer, Farrell G Scruggs, Barbara A Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Garcia
Defendant:
Ruth E Brouwer, Farrell G Scruggs, Barbara A Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Legate v. Garcia et al
as 5:2013cv00841
Defendant:
James D. Garcia and John Doe
Plaintiff:
James Walter Legate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaither v. Ala, et al
as 6:2011cv00143
Defendant:
Warden Charles W. Ala, Community Education Centers, Thomas Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Thaler et al
as 5:2010cv01059
Petitioner:
Daniel D. Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler and The Attorney General of State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez Garrido v. Port Isabel Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00239
Petitioner:
Jose Andres Gomez Garrido
Respondent:
Port Isabel Detention Center, Tamayo , D. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Quarterman
as 2:2008cv00357
Petitioner:
Daniel D Garcia
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
