Cases 1 - 10 of 9,897
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01412
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casterberry v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Anthony Lavelle Casterberry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parmer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Robert B Parmer
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Rayford Glenn Roberson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01376
Petitioner:
Neil Paul Noble
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00507
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2024cv00615
Petitioner:
Gerald Wilson Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
