Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Hall v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Hall
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Henry v. Anthony et al
as 3:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dariel Henry, Jr
Defendant:
Patrick Anthony, Robin Rey, Felix Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sterling v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Ruben Gonzalez, Tarrant County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jackson v. Gordon et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Jackson
Defendant:
Felix Gordon and Captain Larry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Gordon et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Athony Gordon, Central Grievance Office, Mike Ptasiensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Kuntz et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
FNU Kuntz, Laura Gordon and FNU Led
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00419
Petitioner:
Jeffery Wade Gordon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00441
Petitioner:
Jeffery Wade Gordon
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howell, Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 9:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly, Jr., John D. Lackey II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
