Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hinton v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Shannon Rochelle Hinton
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shante Hinton
Defendant:
Sheriff Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shante Hinton
Defendant:
John Doe(s) and Sheriff Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wallace et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Eric Wallace, Fred Patmon, Timothy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton, Jr. v. Mason et al
as 3:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Mason and Hinds County Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Morris et al
as 4:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Morris and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramdeo v. Pleasant et al
as 3:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Defendant:
Z. Pleasant, S. Hinton and E. K. Carlton
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hinton v. Foss et al
as 3:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric J. Foss and Aramark Food Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00616
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Dennis Martin and Premire Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Moore et al
as 5:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Henry Hinton, Jr.
Defendant:
Janet Moore and Kim Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
