Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Bell v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Lynesha Square and Haleigh Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Alfredo Hinojos Harper
Respondent:
Howard County Sheriff and Sheriff Stan Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
as 4:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Hannah Harper
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-1220-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hair v. Bells et al
as 5:2023cv00144
Defendant:
Becky Bells, Becky Harper, Garza County and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Hair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv02087
Plaintiff:
James E Barclay, III
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, Martin, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Contreras v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Contreras and Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant:
Brian Thomas, Brooks W Barfield, Douglas R Woodburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Harris Health Department et al
as 4:2022cv01504
Plaintiff:
Philip Harper
Defendant:
Harris Health Department and Harris County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Harris County Sheriff Department
as 4:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Philip Harper
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Harris County Sheriff Department
as 4:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Philip Harper
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
