Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Curry Jr. v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
James Curry and James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Unknown Mataya, Sheria Davis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00403
Plaintiff:
Decorie Bates
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Unknown Mataya, Sheria Davis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. Pearl River County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Harold David Keyes, Jr.
Defendant:
Pearl River County Jail, Host of Staff, Unknown Mataya and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Host v. USA
as 4:2015cv00137
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Host
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Medical et al
as 4:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Decarlos Moore
Defendant:
Medical, Kirby Griffen, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Disciplinary et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Disciplinary, Unknown Dumas, Unknown Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. EMCF Host of Staff Security et al
as 3:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Johnny Powell
Defendant:
EMCF Host of Staff Security, F. Ovalle, Officer Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leggett v. Floyd et al
as 3:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
Samuel Leggett
Defendant:
Troy Floyd, Mike Taylor, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. EMCF Host Staff et al
as 3:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Cordarriel Rodgers
Defendant:
EMCF Host Staff, Administrative Counselor, Major Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. EMCF Host et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Cruzette Lofton
Defendant:
EMCF Host, Unknown Buscher, Unknown Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
