Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Price v. Rios et al
as 4:2021cv00379
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General Jeffrey A Rosen and Warden Melissa Rios
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Price v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2018cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Price
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Weller et al
as 4:2017cv03905
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Williams
Defendant:
Calvin Weller, Curtis D. Bridges, Jr., Charles H. Landis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Price v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-51022
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE PRICE
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Price v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00269
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00193
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Price
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Price v. Bobby Cummings, et al
as 17-50453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE BOBBY L. CUMMINGS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DUSTY BOYD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILLIP ZEIGLER and others
Michael Price v. Joe Carroll, et al
as 17-50337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. PRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE JOE CARROLL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MURFF BLEDSOE, BOB ODOM and others
Price v. Cummings et al
as 6:2017cv00060
Defendant:
D.A. Dusty Boyd, Sheriff Johnny Burks, Judge Bobby L. Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Carroll et al
as 6:2017cv00059
Defendant:
D.A. Murff Bledsoe, Judge Joe Carroll, Sheriff Eddy Lange and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
