Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Thomas v. Nino
as 23-40385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Hernandez v. Warden, FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Saul Rivas Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas v. Accusers of Arson
as 5:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Cruz A. Rivas
Defendant:
Accusers of Arson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. James Rivas, et al.
as 5:2022cv01365
Plaintiff:
Ellery Carter
Defendant:
James Rivas, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Nino et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Andrew Nino, Gage Rivas, Matthew Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas v. Bexar County Sheriff Department & Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Cruz A. Rivas
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Department & Administration, Donald J. Trump & Followers, Javier Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guel-Rivas v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00514
Petitioner:
Jose DeJesus Guel-Rivas
Respondent:
Phonso J. Rayford and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
