Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03187
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Regino Palacios v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-41217
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINO PALACIOS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Daniel Oriakhi v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 13-11269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, DAVID JUSTICE, Warden, JAMES GRANT, Assistant Warden and others
Palacios v. Livingston
as 5:2013cv00014
Petitioner:
Regino Palacios
Defendant:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry Livingston v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 12-10733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY E. LIVINGSTON, also known as Barry Eugene Livingston
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, JOHN H ADAMS, MICHAEL A. PARMER and others
Barry Livingston v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 12-10724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY E. LIVINGSTON, also known as Barry Eugene Livingston
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, REGINO G. SILVAS, GARY B. RENDALL and others
Livingston v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John H Adams, Michael A Parmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Thaler et al
as 2:2012cv00133
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Regino G Silvas, Gary B Rendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu-Regino v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2012cv00067
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security, GEO Group and others
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Cantu-Regino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Antoine Shockley v. John Fox, et al
as 10-41172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE SHOCKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN FOX, Warden, T C OUTLAW, Past Warden, RICARDO RIOS, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
