Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Garcia-Romeo v. Colbert
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Garcia-Romeo
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Salinas v. Ramirez et al;
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Salinas
Defendant:
Romeo R Ramirez, Araseli B Lichtenberger and Baldemar Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Salinas
Defendant:
Kimberly Perez, Romeo R Ramirez, Duval County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Rangel et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Willie Church
Defendant:
Lt. Romeo Rangel, Lt. Aaron Cavazos and Sven Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Rangel et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Willie Church
Defendant:
Lt. Romeo Rangel, Lt. Aaron Cavazos and Lt. Sven Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Romeo et al
as 6:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Marshall Todd Ward
Defendant:
Leza Romeo, Jason Chatham, Collin County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cristea v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv01613
Petitioner:
Robert Romeo Cristea
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Allgood v. Isabell et al
as 4:2013cv02677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allgood
Defendant:
Wanda Isabell and Romeo Yap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv00253
Petitioner:
Rafael Romeo Reyes
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ashley v. UTMB Correctional Managed Care et al
as 4:2011cv04373
Plaintiff:
Dexter G Ashley
Defendant:
UTMB Correctional Managed Care, Romeo Yap, Sherry J Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
