Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Espinoza v. Soliz et al
as 5:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Pedro Espinoza, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Soliz, Lieutenant D. Romero and Susie Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliz v. Hague
as 23-40330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roger Soliz, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. Hague, Doctor Marcus Hinkle, Joy Onougu, Nurse Practioner and others
Soliz v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jesus Soliz
Defendant:
Nueces County, Sheriff John Hooper, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soliz v. Collier
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Stengel
as 22-50699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arthur R. Holloway, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Stengel, Individual Capacity, Assistant Warden-John B. Connally Unit, Debra Gloor, Individual Capacity, Senior Practice Manager- John B. Connally Unit, Jamecia Rice and others
Tawe v. AKA John Doe et al
as 4:2021cv01789
Defendant:
L. Thompson, T. Brock, H. Klawinsky and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ngeh Tawe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Hague et al
as 3:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Angela N Chevalier, Lateishal P Cherry, First Name Unknown Salazar and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Soliz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
