Cases 11 - 15 of 15
USA v. Real Estate and Commercial Structure
as 6:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Real Estate & Commercial Structure
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Real property located and situated at 404 W. Milton Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Claimant:
Estate of Amado Pardo, Ismael Guzman, Sandra Guzman and others
Respondent:
Real property located and situated at 1615 S. 1st Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas, Real property located and situated at 1619 S. 1st Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas, Real property located and situated at 404 W. Milton Street, Austin, Travis County, Texas and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
U S A v. Mike's Auto Sales Inc Assets et al
as 5:2012cv02164
Defendant:
Mikes Auto Sales Inc Assets , A-1 Auto Finance Co Assets , Mikes Auto Sales Inc Stock and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Citizens National Bank N A , William Paul Boyter , Jennifer Schultz Boyter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF WYNDEN OAKS ESTATES IN HOUSTON
as 4:2010cv03518
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF WYNDEN OAKS ESTATES, AN ADDITION IN HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, ALSO KNOWN AS 5 WYNDEN OAKS DRIVE IN HOUSTON, TEXAS, AND ALL IMPORVEMENTS, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND APPURTENANCES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Real Property Known as Lot 6, Block 2 of La Caleta Estates, Val Verde County, Texas, with all Buildings, Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon
as 5:2007cv01048
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Real Property Known as Lot 6, Block 2 of La Caleta Estates, Val Verde County, Texas, with all Buildings, Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
