Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Wallace v. Cantex Continuing Care Network, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tonya Wallace
Defendant:
Cantex Continuing Care Network, LLC, Alvin Health Care Center Ltd. Co., Sorrento Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mathis v. Stewart Petroleum Corporation
as 5:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
James Mathis
Defendant:
Stewart Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mathis v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
James L Mathis
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mathis v. BDO USA, LLP
as 4:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mathis
Defendant:
BDO USA, LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Mathis v. Providence Health Services of Waco
as 6:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Larry Mathis
Defendant:
Providence Health Services of Waco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Mathis v. Boomtown Casino-Bossier City
as 5:2011cv01909
Plaintiff:
John-Talmage Mathis
Defendant:
Boomtown Casino-Bossier City
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lee v. Frito-Lay Inc
as 3:2009cv01530
Plaintiff:
Mathis Lee
Defendant:
Frito-Lay Inc and Frito-Lay Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mathis et al v. Vizza Wash, LP et al
as 5:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael Mathis, Michael Mathis, Michael Cortez and others
Defendant:
Vizza Wash, LP, Vizza Wash, LP, Vizza Wash, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis, et al v. Special Distribution, et al
as 4:2002cv04225
Plaintiff:
Tarence T Davis, Michael L Parrott, Charles E Alexander and others
Defendant:
Special Distribution Services Inc, A & G Truck Lines Inc, Special Dispatch of Houston Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
