Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Valle v. Wharton County Foods, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv02556
Plaintiff:
Marlon Valle
Defendant:
Wharton County Foods, LLC and Cal-Maine Foods, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Roman v. Technicool Systems Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Horacio Valle Roman
Defendant:
Technicool Systems Inc., Robert Furlough and Jay Barger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tovar et al v. F & W Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00095
Defendant:
F & W Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Tovar, Jr., Gilbert Tovar, III and Jerome (Jerry) Valls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rocio Chavez, et al v. William Sumner, Jr., et al
as 12-20546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCIO CHAVEZ, ROSALIA CHAVEZ, DAVID CHAVEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM EDWARD SUMNER, JR., WILLIAM EDWARD SUMNER, III and HOUSTON POLY BAG I, LIMITED
Lagunas et al v. FAMSA, Inc.
as 4:2009cv03478
Plaintiff:
Ciro Lagunas and Miguel Valle
Defendant:
FAMSA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Valles v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05206
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Valles, Cynthia Valles and Cynthia Valles
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Abramczyk et al v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2008cv04330
Plaintiff:
Greg J. Abramczyk, Clarence H. Ackerman, Charles Allison and others
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrios et al v. Premier Staffing Inc., et al
as 5:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Arturo Barrios, Jose de Jesus Escobedo-Vasquez, Encarnacion Lugo and others
Defendant:
Premier Staffing Inc. and Maria Martinez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valles v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 5:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Irene Valles
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
