Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Ghiselli v. Greyhound Lines,Inc
as 4:2012cv00990
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines,Inc
Plaintiff:
Kathy Ghiselli
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Sirek v. Central Freight Lines Inc
as 3:2010cv02499
Plaintiff:
Michael Sirek
Defendant:
Central Freight Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Shaikh v. Foxx Video, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00890
Plaintiff:
Mahmood H Shaikh
Defendant:
Foxx Video, Inc., Continental Beverages, Inc., Airport Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pierce v. Central Freight Lines, Inc
as 4:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Pierce
Defendant:
Central Freight Lines, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Padalecki v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.-Amalgamated Transit Union National Local 1700 Retirement and Disability Trust
as 5:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Padalecki
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.-Amalgamated Transit Union National Local 1700 Retirement and Disability Trust
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hackler v. P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hackler, Michael T Hackler and Michael T Hackler
Defendant:
P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
South African Marine Corporation, Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited, International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Davis, et al v. Special Distribution, et al
as 4:2002cv04225
Plaintiff:
Tarence T Davis, Michael L Parrott, Charles E Alexander and others
Defendant:
Special Distribution Services Inc, A & G Truck Lines Inc, Special Dispatch of Houston Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
