Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Gao et al v. Hai et al
as 3:2019cv02752
Defendant:
Brad Hai, lang chao, Chao Hai Mei & Partners, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Yifeng Gao and Xiao Hu
Reese v. Royal Audio/Video Supply Co., et al
as 2:2019cv13451
Defendant:
Lori Gervais, Royal Audio Video Supply Co., Unidentified Party and others
Plaintiff:
Brad A Reese
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Bishop v. Creek Pipe Company, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00220
Defendant:
John Muldrow and Creek Pipe Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brad Bishop
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boyer v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00372
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T, Inc., Jaime Benavides and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Etta Boyer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Williams v. Waxahatchee Architectural Salvage LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02409
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Waxahatchee Architectural Salvage LLC, Brad Yates and Karl Goss
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Legros v. Roussell et al
as 6:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tyler Legros , Brad Breaux , Troy LeBleu and others
Defendant:
Janet Roussell, Shelby Roussell and Rocky Roussell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ballance v. Waxahatchee Architectural Salvage LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00895
Plaintiff:
Chrissy Ballance
Defendant:
Waxahatchee Architectural Salvage LLC and Brad Yates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Affordable Roofing, Siding, and Gutters, Inc. v. Artigues et al
as 2:2016cv16872
Plaintiff:
Affordable Roofing, Siding, and Gutters, Inc.
Defendant:
Brad M Artigues and Artigues Restoration Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Brown et al.
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Chrystal King
Defendant:
Chandra Brown , Brad Roberts , Thacattack Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DePauw v. Brown et al
as 2:2016cv00157
Defendant:
Chandra Brown, Brad Roberts, Thacattack Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jon DePauw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
