Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Gillum et al v. Acuity Hospital of Houston, LP et al
as 4:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Annie Gillum , Cynthia Johnson , Sonya Peters and others
Defendant:
Acuity Hospital of Houston, LP , Medical Center Specialty Hospital GP, LLC , Acuity Healthcare, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104
Garcia v. Carr et al
as 4:2010cv01880
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Robert Carr , Ameritrail, Inc. and Trailer Wheel & Frame Co
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Jowell Bullard, et al v. BWXT Pantex, LLC
as 10-10470
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOWELL C. BULLARD, on his own behalf and for all others similarly situated, NORRIS RAY TOLLERSON, JR., on his own behalf and for all others similarly situated, RANDY STOKES, JR., on his behalf and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BWXT PANTEX LLC
Carr v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00192
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Carr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carr et al
as 4:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
IgeaCare Systems USA Inc, IgeaCare Systems USA Inc, IgeaCare Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fanning et al v. Merrick et al
as 4:2007cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning, Board of Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Pipeline Employers Health and Welfare Fund and Board of Trustees of the Hoisting and Portable Engineers Local 178 Apprentice Fund
Defendant:
John Merrick, David B Phillips, Carol Merrick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bullard et al v. BWXT Pantex, LLC
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jowell C Bullard, Jowell C Bullard, Jowell C Bullard and others
Defendant:
BWXT Pantex, LLC, BWXT Pantex, LLC and BWXT Pantex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
