Labor Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, LABR, et al
as 16-11315
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MICHAEL J. HAYES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Tootle v. Director et al
as 1:2016cv00252
Plaintiff: Samuel E. Tootle, III
Defendant: Unknown Director, Unknown Assistant Director, Unknown Director of Primary Care and others
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Brian Dismuke v. McClinton Energy Group, L.L.C., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-50674
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIAN DISMUKE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: MCCLINTON ENERGY GROUP, L.L.C., SURF-FRAC WELLHEAD EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INCORPORATED and TONY MCCLINTON, Individually and as Officer and Director of McClinton and SWECO
Ralph Whitley, et al v. BP, P.L.C., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-20282
Plaintiff - Appellee: RALPH WHITLEY, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, FRANKIE RAMIREZ, DAVID HUMPHRIES and others
Defendant - Appellant: BP, P.L.C., ANTHONY HAYWARD, SAVINGS PLAN INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and others
Sanderson Farms, Incorporated, et al v. NLRB, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-60333
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDERSON FARMS, INCORPORATED and SANDERSON FARMS, INCORPORATED (PROCESSING DIVISION)
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and M. KATHLEEN MCKINNEY, in her Official Capacity as Regional Director of Region 15
Gerhart v. RadioShack Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv04419
Plaintiff: William A Gerhart
Defendant: RadioShack Corp, The Administrative Committee of the RadioShack 401(K) Plan, The Administrative Committe of The RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(E) Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Hill et al v. Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00213
Plaintiff: Robert K. Hill , Donald Byther , Sandy Byther and others
Defendant: Hill Brothers Construction Company, Inc., HBC Board of Directors, Kenneth W. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
M. McKinney v. Creative Vision Resources, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-30839
Plaintiff - Appellee: M. KATHLEEN MCKINNEY, Regional Director of Region Fifteen of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Defendant - Appellant: CREATIVE VISION RESOURCES, L.L.C.
Rowdy Leal v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc
as 14-10136
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rowdy Leal, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, Sigifredo Cisneros, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Timothy J. Heider, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Paramount Restaurants Group, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, Scratch Cookin, Incorporated, a Texas Corporation and others
Rowdy Leal, et al v. Paramount Restaurants Grp, Inc, et al
as 14-10136
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROWDY LEAL, et ux, Angela Leal, individuals, and on behalf of other similarly situated, SIGIFREDO CISNEROS, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated, TIMOTHY J. HEIDER, Individuals, and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: PARAMOUNT RESTAURANTS GROUP, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, formerly known as Strickland Restaurants, Incorporated, STRICKLAND RESTAURANTS, INCORPORATED, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) #002, SCRATCH COOKIN, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?