Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Compton v. Work Management, Inc.
as 4:2019cv04789
Plaintiff:
Kristina Compton and Monte Moore
Defendant:
Work Management, Inc. and High Bridge Associates, Inc.
Miles-Brown v. Love & Joy Personal Care Home et al
as 4:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Natcha Miles-Brown
Defendant:
Love & Joy Personal Care Home and Lover Compton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adeyemi et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Taiwo Ayorinde, Jimoh Adeyemi, Adeniyi Akinwale and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lopez et al v. Casedhole Solutions, Inc.
as 7:2015cv00178
Defendant:
Casedhole Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Compton, Javier Andres Lopez and Isaiah Rocha
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
James et al v. Prime Consulting Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02745
Plaintiff:
Cicely James and Ken Rice
Defendant:
Prime Consulting Group, Inc. , Chihuahtha Compton and Keith Bruce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Heather Clark, et al v. Williamson County
as 12-50561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEATHER CLARK, DAVID CLAXTON and DAVID M. COMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAMSON COUNTY
Abner et al v. Calumet G P L L C
as 5:2012cv00669
Plaintiff:
Derrick Abner , Nathan Allen , Michael Ashby and others
Defendant:
Calumet G P L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Clark et al v. Williamson County
as 1:2010cv00869
Plaintiff:
Heather Clark, David Claxton and David M Compton
Defendant:
Williamson County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gonzalez v. Advance America et al
as 4:2007cv02941
Defendant:
Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Texas, Inc., Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc., Ken E. Compton and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco J. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
