Cases 91 - 100 of 146
Wade v. Barton et al
as 3:2012cv00046
Defendant:
Trent Barton and Jonathan Roundtree
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Roundtree et al
as 3:2012cv00041
Defendant:
Unknown Collins, Kenneth Norris and Jonathan A. Roundtree
Plaintiff:
Troy Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00862
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, #1 John Doe, #2 John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00833
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, #1 John Doe, Carrol Gilcrease and others
Plaintiff:
Noel Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vicks v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00746
Defendant:
Unknown Berry, Burl Cain, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Vicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. Cain et al
as 3:2011cv00726
Defendant:
Robert Butler, N. Burl Cain, Unknown Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Delaney et al
as 3:2011cv00709
Defendant:
Jane Doe Adams, Gary Aymond, Kevin Benjamin and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos McGrew v. LA St Pentry Mntl Health Dept, et al
as 11-30953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS MCGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, KATIE ARD, Doctor, DAVE ANKENBRAND and others
Jackie Lambert v. N. Burl Cain, et al
as 11-30940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE LAMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
N BURL CAIN, JAMES M LEBLANC, Secretary, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Telly Guillory v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-30927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TELLY J GUILLORY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JONATHAN ROUNDTREE and GUY WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
