Cases 111 - 120 of 9,922
Acy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
James Antwone Acy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Birdo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Kenneth R Birdo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Corey Keith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolfford v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Nickolas Wolfford
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashford v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Timothy McClenon Ashford
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cappiello v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
Chad Alan Cappiello
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
