Cases 121 - 130 of 792
Smith v. Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
FNU Houston, Wise County, Wise County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Pryntec
as 6:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Pryntec
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
FILING ERROR
as 6:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Uniview Technology
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sanchez v. Hyper Lane Logistics Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Sanchez
Defendant:
Hyper Lane Logistics Corporation and Mohamed Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Moxa Inc.
as 6:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Moxa Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. ParkHelp USA, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
ParkHelp USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ogle v. White et al
as 7:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Ogle
Defendant:
Robert Lane White, Jr., Linda Sue Elliott, Richard L. Larson and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Oinone Technology, LLC
as 2:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Oinone Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. R. Stahl, Inc.
as 4:2022cv02490
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
R. Stahl, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lane v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02329
Petitioner:
Michael Lane
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
