Cases 141 - 150 of 838,700
Gilmore v. ASI Lloyds
as 4:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
Neferitia Gilmore
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nautilus Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Magellan Midstream Partners, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Solorzano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01898
Plaintiff:
Erica Arias Solorzano
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Poindexter v. Step CG, LLC
as 4:2024cv01905
Plaintiff:
Danny Poindexter
Defendant:
Step CG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
GRAUVOGL et al v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
as 4:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD GRAUVOGL and SUMMER R. GRAUVOGL
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
De La Garza v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2024cv01903
Plaintiff:
Maxiel De La Garza
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vargas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
MANCHA, JR. v. NURI EXPRESS, LLC
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
GILBERTO MANCHA, JR.
Defendant:
NURI EXPRESS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Loeb v. Vo et al
as 4:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Ms. Heather Swartwood Loeb
Defendant:
Anh Xuan Vo and Isha Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Escobar v. The Kroger Company et al
as 4:2024cv01906
Plaintiff:
Eluvia Escobar
Defendant:
The Kroger Company and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
