Cases 161 - 170 of 791
McGeorge v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00164
Defendant:
Unknown Bolker, Trampus Butler, N. Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Kenneth C. McGeorge, Jr.
Dir. Leg. Program:
Trish Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgo v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
Donald Christopher Burgo
Defendant:
N Burl Cain and James D Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00165
Defendant:
Jonna Brewer, N Burl Cain and Unknown Lartigue
Plaintiff:
Lacal Lucky Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgo v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00156
Petitioner:
Donald Burgo
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demouchette v. Cain
as 1:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
Preston G Demouchette, Jr
Defendant:
N Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00135
Petitioner:
Calvin Lopez Alexander
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Esteve v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00787
Plaintiff:
Vernon Esteve
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00749
Plaintiff:
Tyskie Ross
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moser v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
William Moser
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson v. Cain et al
as 3:2015cv00102
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James D. Caldwell
Petitioner:
Douglas Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
