Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Caldarera v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joseph Caldarera
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. , Tyco International, Ltd. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ichos, LLC v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Ichos, LLC
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tobi Gellman, as Trustee of the Mayer Michael Lebowitz Trust v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00501
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman, as Trustee of the Mayer Michael Lebowitz Trust
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Khan et al v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv03744
Plaintiff:
Usman Khan and Noreen Khan
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valbruna Stainless Inc v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 4:2010cv02513
Plaintiff:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Holdings Inc
Counter_claimant:
ADT Security Services Inc
Counter_defendant:
Valbruna Stainless Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gellman v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00237
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Movant:
Susan Asmanovs
Tobi Gellman Third Party Subpoena Matter
as 3:2010mc00078
Plaintiff:
Tobi Gellman
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc, Diebold Incorporated, Digital Security Controls Inc and others
v. ADT Security Services Inc
as 3:2010cv00937
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nacol & Co. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Nacol & Co.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Van Peterson Fine Jewelers v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv01883
Plaintiff:
Van Peterson Fine Jewelers
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
