Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Alexander v. ARAMARK Services, Inc et al
as 4:2016cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc and Nabors Offshore Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv03339
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. , Transocean Enterprise, Inc. , Transocean Drilling (USA), Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00705
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Russia Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02395
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. , Transocean Enterprise Inc , Transocean Drilling (U.S.A.) Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tywanda Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Heim v. ARAMARK Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03494
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Heim
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc. , Occupational Safety Training Inc and ARAMARK U.S. Offshore Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gaspard v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv00131
Petitioner:
Travis P Gaspard
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Aramark Food Service Corporation, Aramark U.S. Offshore Services and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Latin et al v. ARAMARK Services, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00858
Plaintiff:
Freddie Latin, Freddie Latin, Iashia Nelson and others
Defendant:
ARAMARK Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
