Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Boutte v. 15th JDC D.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
15th JDC D.A., Jules D. Edwards and Keith A Stutes
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Boutte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Normand et al
as 2:2016cv15989
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Newell Normand, JPSO, 24th JDC House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Normand et al
as 2:2016cv15597
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Newell Normand , JPSO, 24th JDC House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Normand et al
as 3:2016cv00641
Defendant:
24th JDC House, Paul B. Connick, Jr., JPSO and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2016cv13032
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Louisiana State, 24th JDC House, King Hammer Kat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Jindal et al
as 2:2016cv02385
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal, State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Jindal et al
as 3:2016cv00053
Defendant:
24th JDC House, Angola State Prison, Unknown Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. 23rd JDC Div "E" et al
as 3:2015cv00716
Respondent:
23rd JDC Div "E" and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Christopher Buckenberger v. Gerald Nielsen, et al
as 15-30834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BUCKENBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD J. NIELSEN, Attorney, JOHN D. CARTER, Attorney, KEITH M. DETWEILER, Attorney and others
Johnson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2015cv00597
Defendant:
24th JDC Court House, Paul D. Connick, Jr., Paul D. Connick, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
