Cases 11 - 20 of 852
USA v. Talamantes-Romero
as 24-50266
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Antonio Talamantes-Romero
USA v. Talamantes-Romero
as 24-50254
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Antonio Talamantes-Romero
Caballero-Romero v. Garland
as 24-60151
Petitioner:
Xiomara Caballero-Romero and Kerstin Xiomara Lopez-Caballero
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00738
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC v. LSM Seafood LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed-Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
LSM Seafood LLC doing business as La Sirena Seafood, Ahidee Romero doing business as La Sirena Seafood and Maria Gonzalez doing business as La Sirena Seafood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Briceno-Romero v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Marcos Andres Briceno-Romero
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Romero-Ibarra
as 24-10127
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Romero-Ibarra
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Adolios LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Adolios LLC d/b/a Public House, d/b/a Public House Brownsville, and d/b/a Public House Sports House, Marco A. Romero, Jr. and Marco A. Romero, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
