Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Texas Corn Producers v. EPA
as 24-60209
Petitioner:
Texas Corn Producers, Texas Sorghum Producers and National Sorghum Producers
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Texas Chemistry Council v. EPA
as 24-60193
Petitioner:
Texas Chemistry Council
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Deep South Ctr for Env Justice v. EPA
as 24-60084
Petitioner:
Deep South Center for Environmental Justice, Healthy Gulf and Alliance for Affordable Energy
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan
Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 3:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Spring Branch Wildlife Preserve and Ted Dahl
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60635
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Inhance Technologies. v. EPA
as 23-60620
Petitioner:
Inhance Technologies, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas v. EPA
as 23-60616
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ergon Refining v. EPA
as 23-60492
Petitioner:
Ergon Refining, Incorporated, Ergon-West Virginia, Incorporated and Placid Refining Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Wynnewood Refng v. EPA
as 23-60427
Petitioner:
Wynnewood Refining Company, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
San Antonio Refinery v. EPA
as 23-60399
Petitioner:
San Antonio Refinery, L.L.C. and Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
