Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Schexnayder v. Avondale Industries, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00775
Defendant: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Foster Wheeler LLC, Owens-Illinois, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans and Uniroyal Holdings, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Albert L Bossier, Jr
Plaintiff: Denis Schexnayder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dempster v. Lamorak Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv06158
Defendant: Lamorak Insurance Company , Huntington Ingalls Incorporated , Albert Bossier, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Callen L. Dempster
Cross_claimant: J. Melton Garrett and Albert Bossier, Jr.
Cross_defendant: Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , Foster-Wheeler LLC , General Electric Company and others
Third_party_plaintiff: J. Melton Garrett and Albert Bossier, Jr.
Third_party_defendant: Claims Resolution Management Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melancon et al v. Lamorak Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv12367
Plaintiff: Sandra Vicknair Melancon and Lynn M Melancon
Defendant: Lamorak Insurance Company , Huntington Ingalls Incorporated , Albert Bossier, Jr. and others
Third_party_defendant: Claims Resolution Management Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Houston General Insurance Company
Third_party_plaintiff: J Melton Garrett and Albert Bossier, Jr.
Cross_claimant: J Melton Garrett and Albert Bossier, Jr.
Cross_defendant: 3M Company , American Insurance Company , Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Templet, Sr. v. Avondale Industries, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv05935
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated , Albert Bossier, Jr. , Lamorak Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: Robert J. Templet, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Travelers Indemnity Company, et al v. Forrest County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60291
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee: ETHEL MITCHELL, Executrix of the Estate of Phillip Bivens, ESTATE OF LARRY RUFFIN, ESTATE OF BOBBY RAY DIXON and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv15449
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
The Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Forrest County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00022
Plaintiff: The Travelers Indemnity Company , The Travelers Indemnity Company of America , United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and others
Defendant: Forrest County, City of Hattiesburg, Raymond Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Retzer Resources, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00103
Plaintiff: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Defendant: Retzer Resources, Inc. and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Associated Indemnity Corporation et al v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff: Associated Indemnity Corporation and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Defendant: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Prestia v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01432
Plaintiff: Michael G. Prestia
Defendant: United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?