Cases 11 - 20 of 237
Sanchez de Vicente v. Sams East, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Perfecta Sanchez de Vicente
Defendant:
Sams East, Inc. and Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
USA v. Rubio-Flores
as 24-40079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Vicente Rubio-Flores
Perez et al v. Singh et al
as 4:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
VICENTE PEREZ and Krystal Ramirez Holz
Defendant:
Jobandeep Singh and Hira Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gutierrez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Vicente Gutierrez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. v. Prometo Produce Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. doing business as Robinson Fresh
Defendant:
Prometo Produce Corp. and Vicente Diaz Moreno
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Cabuya v. Garland
as 23-60523
Petitioner:
Vicente Paulo Cabuya, Esperanca Luzolo Tuvevele and Cintia Vicente Cabuya
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02030
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Young v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Charles Young
Respondent:
TDCJ Parole Division, Daniella Martinez, Vicente Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ramos v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 6:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Vicente V. Ramos
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
